Verification methodology

How public claims are checked

Product pages should describe what the current service actually does. This methodology defines the evidence used for pricing, workflows, privacy, localization, and technical SEO statements.

Live behavior comes first

A claim is retained only when it can be supported by the running service, its current configuration, or an explicit public policy.

01

Workflow verification

Photo, batch, mapped group-photo, video, and GIF pages are checked against the matching submission endpoints, task states, and downloadable outputs.

02

Price verification

Credit package claims are compared with the public credit-plan endpoint. Duration or output-based task costs are checked against the amount displayed before submission.

03

Reward verification

Signup, check-in, sharing, and referral rewards are tested against server-side limits, duplicate-claim behavior, and balance changes.

04

Privacy verification

Retention and indexing statements are checked against cleanup jobs, media route headers, robots directives, and the current Privacy Policy.

Search and user experience checks

Localization

Each localized product page must have one translated H1, translated title and description, a self-referencing canonical URL, and reciprocal hreflang links for all supported languages.

Structured data

JSON-LD must parse as valid JSON and use the same canonical URL and language as the visible page. Ratings, certifications, customer counts, and unsupported offers are excluded.

Mobile behavior

Primary navigation, authentication, upload controls, rewards, support, and checkout are checked at phone and desktop viewport sizes without overlapping controls.

Crawlability

Canonical pages must return 200, moved routes must use a relevant 301, permanently retired routes use 410, and private routes remain noindex and out of the sitemap.

Third-party comparisons

Competitor facts must come from current official product pages, app-store listings, policies, or documentation. Unknown features stay unconfirmed, source links and review dates remain visible, and no quality winner is declared without a controlled benchmark.

Open research provenance

Reusable evidence is listed in the canonical research catalog, mirrored in versioned releases, checksummed, and kept separate by evidence type. The evaluation metric map documents protocol choices without presenting an unrun metric as a result.

What is not claimed

Generated quality varies with pose, lighting, occlusion, resolution, motion, and the similarity of the supplied faces. The site does not publish invented benchmark scores, user totals, review ratings, certifications, hardware claims, or guaranteed response times.

Time-sensitive facts

Prices, limits, and payment methods can change. The live interface and current API response take priority over cached search snippets or third-party pages.

Corrections

Report an inaccurate public claim to support@deepswapai.com with the page URL and observed behavior.

Review date

This methodology and the linked public reference were reviewed on July 14, 2026.

Check the current product reference

The full reference lists canonical routes, current credits, reward rules, retention, and safety boundaries.

Open product reference